Skip to content
Indian PhilosophyOS

A question

Why do humans suffer?

Editorial overview

Quick answer

Editorial overview

Indian traditions tend to locate the root of suffering not only in outer events but in how we relate to them. Buddhism places craving at the centre, Yoga lists ignorance and its offshoots as afflictions, Vedanta traces suffering to mistaking the Self for body and mind, and Jainism to passions that bind karmic matter. Theistic traditions add that turning away from God deepens suffering and grace can end it. The traditions disagree on metaphysics but share the practical claim that suffering can be understood and reduced.

Concepts involved

Philosophical perspectives

Different answers, each in its own terms. None is ranked.
Buddhist philosophy

The Buddha's first teaching names suffering (dukkha), its origin in craving, its cessation and the path; suffering is also tied to impermanence and to clinging to a self.

Dhammapada

Yoga (Patanjala)

Patanjali names five afflictions (kleshas) — ignorance, I-am-ness, attachment, aversion and clinging to life — with ignorance the field of the rest; future suffering is to be avoided.

Yoga Sutras of Patanjali

Sankhya

Sankhya begins from three kinds of suffering — bodily and mental, from other beings, and from natural forces — and seeks lasting relief through discriminating knowledge.

Sankhya Karika

Vedanta

Vedanta traces suffering to identifying the Self with body, mind and their changing states; knowledge of the Self removes this confusion.

Vivekachudamani

Jain philosophy

Jainism holds that passions such as anger, pride, deceit and greed attract karmic matter to the soul, and this bondage is the source of suffering.

Tattvartha Sutra

Start here

Primary sources

References to the texts behind each perspective.

The Gita’s answer

Grounded in Sadhak Sanjivani.

Continue exploring