Shramana traditions
बौद्ध दर्शन
Buddhist philosophy
Bauddha darśana
In simple words
Buddhism starts from a simple observation: life involves suffering, and suffering has causes we can understand and remove. It teaches that there is no fixed, permanent self, and that freedom comes from seeing how everything arises from causes.
Overview
Buddhist philosophy begins from the teaching attributed to Siddhartha Gautama, the Buddha: the Four Noble Truths of suffering (dukkha), its origin in craving, its cessation (nirvana), and the path leading there. Shared foundations include impermanence (anitya), no-self (anatta) — the denial of an unchanging, independent self — and dependent origination (pratityasamutpada), the teaching that all phenomena arise in dependence on conditions. Buddhism is not one philosophy but many: Abhidharma schools such as Theravada and Sarvastivada analyse experience into momentary elements (dharmas); Madhyamaka argues that all such elements are empty (shunya) of intrinsic nature; Yogacara analyses experience in terms of consciousness; and the epistemological tradition of Dignaga and Dharmakirti develops a theory of perception and inference. Schools also differ on the status of the Buddha, the bodhisattva ideal and which scriptures are authoritative. Buddhism rejects the authority of the Veda and is classed as a heterodox (nastika) darshana in Brahmanical doxographies.
Scholar’s note
Indian doxographies often list four Buddhist schools: Vaibhashika (Sarvastivada), Sautrantika, Yogacara and Madhyamaka. Theravada is the surviving Sthavira lineage. Key debates include the two truths, the momentariness of dharmas, whether the mind is self-aware (svasamvedana), and the nature of Buddha-nature (tathagatagarbha).Core questions
- ?Why do we suffer, and can suffering end?
- ?Is there a permanent self?
- ?How do things arise and cease?
- ?What is nirvana?
- ?What is the path to awakening?
How it sees
- What problem is it trying to solve?
- Suffering (dukkha): how it arises from craving and ignorance, and how it can be brought to an end.
- What does it consider real?
- Schools differ: Abhidharma schools hold that momentary elements (dharmas) are ultimately real; Madhyamaka that nothing has intrinsic nature (shunyata); Yogacara that experience is structured by consciousness; the Dignaga–Dharmakirti tradition that only momentary particulars are ultimately real.
- What is valid knowledge?
- Most schools accept two: perception (pratyaksha) and inference (anumana). The Dignaga–Dharmakirti tradition makes this explicit; earlier sources also treat the Buddha's word as authoritative, and Madhyamaka questions whether any pramana is intrinsically established.
- What is the Self?
- There is no permanent, independent self (anatta). A person is a changing stream of five aggregates (skandhas) — form, feeling, perception, formations and consciousness — arising in dependence on conditions. Some schools, such as the Pudgalavada, held a more qualified view.
- What causes bondage?
- Ignorance (avidya) and craving (trishna), which drive intentional action (karma) and rebirth, as analysed in the twelve links of dependent origination.
- What is liberation?
- Nirvana: the cessation of craving and suffering and release from rebirth. Mahayana schools add the ideal of full Buddhahood for the benefit of all beings; they interpret nirvana's nature differently.
- What is the path?
- The Noble Eightfold Path, grouped as ethics (shila), meditation (samadhi) and wisdom (prajna); in Mahayana, the bodhisattva path of the perfections (paramitas).
Core concepts
Schools within
Primary texts
- DhammapadaA collection of 423 verses in the Pali canon on the mind, ethics and the path to liberation, one of the most read Buddhist texts.Source not yet ingested
- MulamadhyamakakarikaNagarjuna's foundational verses of the Madhyamaka ("Middle Way") school, arguing that all things are empty of intrinsic nature.Source not yet ingested
Major thinkers
Where it disagrees
With Advaita Vedanta · the Self
Buddhism denies a permanent Self; Advaita holds the Self is the one reality. Some Vedantins accused Buddhists of nihilism, and some Buddhists regarded Vedanta's Self as a subtle form of clinging.
With Nyaya · enduring substances and the self
Buddhist logicians argue that only momentary events exist; Nyaya defends enduring substances and selves.
With Jain philosophy · the soul
Jainism affirms a real, eternal soul (jiva); Buddhism denies one.
Related traditions
Connections
Continue exploring
Questions
Compare