Skip to content
Indian PhilosophyOS

A question

How do we know something is true?

Editorial overview

Quick answer

Editorial overview

Indian philosophy developed a sophisticated theory of knowledge around pramanas, the valid means of knowing. Schools accept different lists: Charvaka only perception; Buddhists perception and inference; Sankhya and Yoga add testimony; Nyaya adds comparison; Mimamsa and Vedanta add postulation and non-perception. Debates concern whether scripture counts as independent knowledge, whether knowledge is self-validating, and how error arises.

Concepts involved

Philosophical perspectives

Different answers, each in its own terms. None is ranked.
Nyaya

Nyaya accepts four pramanas — perception, inference, comparison and testimony — and developed a detailed logic of inference and debate.

Nyaya Sutras 1.1.3

Charvaka / Lokayata

The Charvaka materialists accepted only perception, arguing that inference cannot be guaranteed and so claims about unseen realities are unwarranted.

Buddhist philosophy

Buddhist epistemologists such as Dignaga and Dharmakirti accepted only perception and inference, treating testimony as a form of inference.

Sankhya

Sankhya accepts perception, inference and reliable testimony, and uses inference to establish realities not directly perceived, such as unmanifest nature.

Sankhya Karika

Purva Mimamsa

Mimamsa holds that knowledge is intrinsically valid unless defeated, and that the Veda, being authorless, is a self-standing source of knowledge about dharma.

Mimamsa Sutras

Jain philosophy

Jainism frames knowledge through many-sidedness: claims are qualified by standpoint (naya) and conditional assertion (syadvada).

Tattvartha Sutra

Start here

Primary sources

References to the texts behind each perspective.

Continue exploring